Risks are about events that, when triggered, cause problems or benefits.
Hence, risk identification can start with the source of our problems and those of our competitors benefitor with the problem consequenses. Source analysis  — Risk sources may be internal or external to the system that is the target of risk management use mitigation instead of management since by its own definition risk deals with factors of decision-making that cannot be managed.
Examples of risk sources are: stakeholders of a project, employees of a company or the weather over an airport. Problem analysis[ citation needed ] — Risks are related to identified threats. For example: the threat of losing money, the threat of abuse of confidential information or the threat of human errors, accidents and casualties.
The threats may exist with various entities, most important with shareholders, customers and legislative bodies managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni as the government. When either source managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni problem is known, the events that a source may trigger or the events that can lead to a problem can be investigated. For example: stakeholders withdrawing during cum să lucrați cu un robot de tranzacționare project may endanger funding of the project; confidential information may be stolen by employees even within a closed network; lightning striking an aircraft during takeoff may make all people on board immediate casualties.
The chosen method of identifying risks may depend on culture, industry practice and compliance. The identification methods are formed by templates or the development of templates for identifying source, problem or event.
Common risk identification methods are: Objectives-based risk identification[ citation needed ] — Organizations and project teams have objectives. Any event that may prevent an objective from being achieved is identified as risk. Scenario-based risk identification — In scenario analysis different scenarios are created. The scenarios may be the alternative ways to achieve an objective, or an analysis of the interaction of forces in, for example, a market or battle.
Any event that triggers an undesired scenario alternative is identified as risk — see Futures Studies for methodology used by Futurists. Taxonomy-based risk identification — The taxonomy in taxonomy-based risk identification is a breakdown of possible risk sources.
Based on the taxonomy and knowledge of best practices, a questionnaire is compiled. The answers to the questions reveal risks.
Each risk in the list can be checked for application to a particular situation. Creating a matrix under these headings enables a variety of approaches. One can begin with resources and consider the threats they are exposed to and the consequences of each.
Alternatively one can start with the threats and examine which resources they would affect, or one can begin with the consequences and determine which combination of threats and resources would be involved to bring them about.
Main article: Risk assessment Once risks have been identified, they must then be assessed as to managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni potential severity of impact generally a negative impact, such as damage or loss and to the probability of occurrence. These quantities can be either simple to measure, in the case of the value of a lost building, or impossible to know for sure in the case of an unlikely event, the probability of occurrence of which is unknown.
Therefore, in the assessment process it is critical to make the managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni educated decisions in order to properly prioritize the implementation of the risk management plan. Even a short-term positive improvement can have long-term negative impacts. Take the "turnpike" example. A highway is widened to allow more traffic. More traffic capacity leads to greater development in the areas surrounding the improved traffic capacity.
Over time, traffic thereby increases to fill available capacity.
Turnpikes thereby need to be expanded in a seemingly endless cycles. There are many other engineering examples where expanded capacity to do any function is soon filled by increased demand.
Since expansion comes at a cost, the resulting growth could become unsustainable without forecasting and management. The fundamental difficulty in risk assessment is determining the rate of occurrence managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni statistical information is not available on all kinds of past incidents and is particularly scanty in the case of catastrophic events, simply because of their infrequency.
Furthermore, evaluating the severity of the consequences impact is often quite difficult for intangible assets. Asset valuation is another question that needs to be addressed. Thus, best educated opinions and available statistics are the primary sources of information.
Nevertheless, risk assessment should produce such information for senior executives of the organization that the primary risks are easy to understand and that the risk management decisions may be prioritized within overall company goals. Thus, there have been several theories and attempts to quantify risks.
Direcții de Analiză Tehnică și Managementul riscului 26.04.2017
Numerous different risk formulae exist, but perhaps the most widely accepted formula for risk quantification is: "Rate or probability of occurrence multiplied by the impact of the event equals risk magnitude. Periodically re-assess risks that are accepted in ongoing processes as a normal feature of business operations and modify mitigation measures. Transfer risks to an external agency e.
In business it is imperative to be able to present the findings of risk assessments in financial, market, or schedule terms. Robert Courtney Jr. IBM, proposed a formula for presenting risks in financial terms.
The Courtney formula was accepted as the official risk analysis method for the US governmental agencies. The formula proposes calculation of ALE annualized loss expectancy and compares the expected loss value to the security control implementation costs cost-benefit analysis.
Potential risk treatments[ edit ] Once risks have been identified and assessed, all techniques to manage the risk fall into one or more of these four major categories:  Avoidance eliminate, withdraw from or not become involved Reduction optimize — managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni Sharing transfer — outsource or insure Retention accept and budget Ideal use of these risk control strategies may not be possible.
Some of them may involve trade-offs that are not acceptable to the organization or person making the risk management decisions. Risk avoidance[ edit ] This includes not performing an activity that could present risk. Refusing to purchase a property or business to avoid legal liability ce programe puteți câștiga pe internet one such example.
Avoiding airplane flights for fear of hijacking. Avoidance may seem like the answer to all risks, but avoiding risks managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni means losing out on the potential gain that accepting retaining the risk may have allowed. Not entering a business to avoid the risk of loss also avoids the possibility of earning profits.
Increasing risk regulation in hospitals has led to avoidance of treating higher risk conditions, in favor of patients presenting with lower risk.
For example, sprinklers are designed to put out a fire to reduce the risk of loss by fire. This method may cause a greater loss by water damage and managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni may not be suitable.
Halon fire suppression systems may mitigate that risk, but the cost may be prohibitive as a strategy. Acknowledging that risks can be positive or negative, optimizing risks means finding a balance between negative risk and the benefit of the operation or activity; and between risk reduction and effort applied. By effectively applying Health, Safety and Environment HSE management standards, organizations can achieve tolerable levels of residual risk. Early methodologies suffered from the fact managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni they only delivered software in the final phase of development; any problems encountered in earlier phases meant costly rework and often jeopardized the whole project.
Managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni developing in iterations, software projects can limit effort wasted to a single iteration. Outsourcing could be an example of risk sharing strategy if the outsourcer can demonstrate higher capability at managing or reducing risks.
This way, the company can concentrate more on business development without having to worry as much about the manufacturing process, managing the development team, or finding a physical location for a center.
Risk sharing[ edit ] Briefly defined as "sharing with another party the burden of loss or the benefit of gain, from a risk, and the measures to reduce a risk. In practice if the insurance company or contractor go bankrupt or end up in court, the original risk is likely to still revert to the first party.
As such, in the terminology of practitioners and scholars alike, the purchase of an insurance contract is often described as a "transfer of risk. For example, a personal injuries insurance policy does not transfer the risk of a car accident to the insurance company. The risk still lies with the policy holder namely the person who has been in the managementul riscurilor cu opțiuni.
Methods of managing risk fall into multiple categories. Risk retention pools are technically retaining the risk for the group, but spreading it over the whole group involves transfer among individual members of the group.